User talk:W0DBW: Difference between revisions

From Free Knowledge Base- The DUCK Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RG8, RG8X, RG58U: new section
Line 21: Line 21:
* smaller than RG8 with less loss than RG58U
* smaller than RG8 with less loss than RG58U
* still not as good as RG8
* still not as good as RG8
[http://hamradio.arc.nasa.gov/coaxcableloss.html NASA Coax Cable Loss Chart]

Revision as of 21:10, 20 July 2015

articles to read

My new CLICK ME banner

RG8, RG8X, RG58U

RG58U

  • more flexible
  • lower cost
  • good for short runs with mobile installations

RG8

  • less loss on long runs 50ft - 100ft
  • thicker and less flexible

RG8X (mini foam)

  • smaller than RG8 with less loss than RG58U
  • still not as good as RG8

NASA Coax Cable Loss Chart