Changes

Use of Over in Amateur Radio

6 bytes added, 19:18, 6 February 2019
/* Not All Sources Always Agree */
The following lines were added (+) and removed (-):
For the record, I see no issue or misuse in protocol by ending a transmission with the word "over" or "back to you."  It doesn't offend me as a ham operator, nor can I find any consistent evidence that it is bad practice.  However, I will remark that on an FM repeater it is simply not necessary.  There are almost always indicators that make it evident to the listener that you have terminated your transmission beyond the simple grammatical completion of a sentence, such as the squelch tail or sound evident from the repeater.  So, it can be said that by saying "over" you are simply extending your transmission longer than what is necessary on the repeater and upsetting those global warming guys by wasting a tiny little bit of energy.For the record, I see no issue or misuse in protocol by ending a transmission with the word "over" or "back to you."  It doesn't offend me as a ham operator, nor can I find any consistent evidence that it is bad practice.  However, I will remark that on an FM repeater it is '''simply not necessary'''.  There are almost always indicators that make it evident to the listener that you have terminated your transmission beyond the simple grammatical completion of a sentence, such as the squelch tail or sound evident from the repeater.  So, it can be said that by saying "over" you are simply extending your transmission longer than what is necessary on the repeater and upsetting those global warming guys by wasting a tiny little bit of energy.
Administrator
4,579
edits